TON vs. Polygon
In this article we'll compare TON and Polygon. This is an indepth review that considers many metrics.
Overview
| TON | Polygon | |
|---|---|---|
| Created by | Nikolai and Pavel Durov | Jaynti Kanani, Sandeep Nailwa, Anurag Arjun, and Mihailo Bjelic |
| Native token | TON | MATIC |
| Consensus algorithm | PoS | PoS |
| Hashing algorithm | KECCAK-256 | KECCAK-256 |
| Supports EVM | No | Yes |
| TPS | 1000000 | 7000 |
| Block time (secs) | 5 | 2 |
| Layer | 1 | 2 |
| Supports smart contracts | Yes | Yes |
| Average transaction fee | $0.012375 | $0.018 |
| Staking rewards (APR) | 6.85% | 4.78% |
Table of Contents
Comparison
Is TON faster than Polygon?
Yes, TON processes 1000000 transactions per second, whereas Polygon only processes 7000.
Is TON cheaper than Polygon?
Yes, TON has an average transaction fee of $0.012375, whereas Polygon costs $0.018.