Aptos vs Cosmos
Aptos and Cosmos are two popular blockchains. In this article we'll compare them across a variety of metrics. Both blockchains have their own strengths and weaknesses, and we'll explore them below.
Table of Contents
Comparing Metrics
| Aptos | Cosmos | |
|---|---|---|
| Created by | Avery Ching | Ethan Buchman and Jae Kwon |
| Native token | APT | ATOM |
| Consensus algorithm | PoS | PoS |
| Hashing algorithm | KECCAK-256 | SHA-256 |
| Supports EVM | Yes | No |
| TPS | 160000 | 10000 |
| Block time (secs) | 4 | 1 |
| Layer | 1 | 0 |
| Supports smart contracts | Yes | Yes |
| Average transaction fee | $0.0000012 | $0.01 |
| Staking rewards (APR) | 7% | 25.4% |
High-level Comparisons
Is Aptos faster than Cosmos?
Yes, Aptos can process 160000 transactions per second. Cosmos only processes up to 10000.
Is Aptos cheaper than Cosmos?
Yes, Aptos has an average transaction fee of $0.0000012, whereas Cosmos costs $0.01.