Aptos vs Monero
Aptos and Monero are two popular blockchains. In this article we'll compare them across a variety of metrics. Both blockchains have their own strengths and weaknesses, and we'll explore them below.
Table of Contents
Metrics
| Aptos | Monero | |
|---|---|---|
| Created by | Avery Ching | Riccardo Spagni |
| Native token | APT | XMR |
| Consensus algorithm | PoS | PoW |
| Hashing algorithm | KECCAK-256 | randomx |
| Supports EVM | Yes | No |
| TPS | 160000 | 1700 |
| Block time (secs) | 4 | 120 |
| Layer | 1 | 1 |
| Supports smart contracts | Yes | No |
| Average transaction fee | $0.0000012 | $0.001 |
| Staking rewards (APR) | 7% | % |
Detailed Comparison
Core Technology & Architecture
Aptos and Monero represent two fundamentally different approaches to blockchain technology, each designed with distinct goals in mind.
Aptos features:
- Layer 1 blockchain with EVM compatibility
- Smart contract functionality
- KECCAK-256 hashing algorithm
- Proof of Stake consensus
- 4-second block time
Monero features:
- Layer 1 privacy-focused blockchain
- No smart contract capability
- RandomX hashing algorithm
- Proof of Work consensus
- 120-second block time
The architectural differences between these chains reflect their core purposes. Aptos is built for high performance and versatility, with its EVM compatibility enabling a wide range of decentralized applications. In contrast, Monero prioritizes privacy and security through its specialized RandomX algorithm, which was specifically designed to be ASIC-resistant.
Performance Metrics
The performance characteristics of these blockchains show significant variations:
Aptos:
- Transactions per second (TPS): 160,000
- Block time: 4 seconds
- Average transaction fee: $0.0000012
Monero:
- Transactions per second (TPS): 1,700
- Block time: 120 seconds
- Average transaction fee: $0.001
Aptos clearly leads in raw performance metrics, offering nearly 100x higher TPS than Monero. This massive throughput difference makes Aptos more suitable for high-frequency trading and complex DeFi applications. However, it's important to note that Monero's lower TPS is a deliberate trade-off for enhanced privacy features and decentralization.
Economic Model & Incentives
Aptos implements:
- Proof of Stake consensus
- 7% staking rewards
- No maximum supply
- Native token: APT
Monero features:
- Proof of Work consensus
- Mining rewards
- No maximum supply
- Native token: XMR
The economic models reflect different approaches to network security and participant incentivization. Aptos's PoS system encourages long-term holding and network participation through staking rewards, while Monero's PoW system rewards computational work and maintains decentralization through mining.
Development & Community Support
Both blockchains maintain strong development communities but with different focuses:
Aptos:
- Created by Avery Ching
- Active presence on multiple social platforms
- Strong focus on developer tools and documentation
- Regular updates through Medium blog posts
Monero:
- Created by Riccardo Spagni
- Privacy-focused community
- Strong GitHub presence
- Wikipedia presence indicating historical significance
- No official Medium blog
The development approaches reflect their respective philosophies: Aptos emphasizes transparency and regular communication, while Monero maintains a more privacy-oriented approach to development and community interaction.
Use Cases & Applications
Aptos excels in:
- DeFi applications
- Smart contract deployment
- High-frequency trading
- Cross-chain interactions
- Enterprise solutions
Monero specializes in:
- Private transactions
- Store of value
- Anonymous transfers
- Confidential business transactions
- Privacy-focused applications
The use cases for each blockchain are distinctly different. Aptos's high performance and smart contract capabilities make it ideal for complex financial applications and enterprise solutions. Monero's privacy features make it the go-to choice for users prioritizing transaction privacy and fungibility.
Technical Trade-offs
Each blockchain makes specific technical trade-offs to achieve its goals:
Aptos prioritizes:
- High throughput
- Fast finality
- Smart contract functionality
- Cross-chain compatibility
- Developer accessibility
Monero emphasizes:
- Transaction privacy
- ASIC resistance
- Decentralization
- Fungibility
- Network security
These trade-offs demonstrate how each blockchain has been optimized for its intended purpose. Aptos sacrifices some degree of decentralization for performance, while Monero trades performance for enhanced privacy and security features.
Future Outlook
Both blockchains show promising but different paths forward:
Aptos:
- Potential for increased TPS through technical improvements
- Growing ecosystem of DeFi applications
- Expansion of cross-chain capabilities
- Focus on enterprise adoption
Monero:
- Continued focus on privacy enhancements
- Regular protocol upgrades for ASIC resistance
- Maintaining fungibility advantages
- Potential atomic swap developments
The future development paths reflect their core values and initial design choices. Aptos is likely to continue pushing performance boundaries and expanding its smart contract ecosystem, while Monero will likely maintain its focus on privacy innovations and decentralization improvements.
FAQs
Is Aptos faster than Monero?
Yes, Aptos can process 160000 transactions per second. Monero only processes up to 1700.
Is Aptos cheaper than Monero?
Yes, Aptos has an average transaction fee of $0.0000012, whereas Monero costs $0.001.