Arbitrum vs Cosmos
Arbitrum and Cosmos are two popular blockchains. In this article we'll compare them across a variety of metrics. Both blockchains have their own strengths and weaknesses, and we'll explore them below.
Table of Contents
Comparing Metrics
| Arbitrum | Cosmos | |
|---|---|---|
| Created by | Germans Gedgauds | Ethan Buchman and Jae Kwon |
| Native token | ETH | ATOM |
| Consensus algorithm | PoS | PoS |
| Hashing algorithm | KECCAK-256 | SHA-256 |
| Supports EVM | Yes | No |
| TPS | 4000 | 10000 |
| Block time (secs) | 13 | 1 |
| Layer | 2 | 0 |
| Supports smart contracts | Yes | Yes |
| Average transaction fee | $0.101 | $0.01 |
| Staking rewards (APR) | 0% | 25.4% |
High-level Comparisons
Is Arbitrum faster than Cosmos?
No, Arbitrum only processes 4000 transactions per second. Cosmos processes up to 10000.
Is Arbitrum cheaper than Cosmos?
No, Arbitrum has an average transaction fee of $0.101, whereas Cosmos costs $0.01.