Arbitrum vs Polygon
Arbitrum and Polygon are two popular blockchains. In this article we'll compare them across a variety of metrics. Both blockchains have their own strengths and weaknesses, and we'll explore them below.
Table of Contents
Comparing Metrics
| Arbitrum | Polygon | |
|---|---|---|
| Created by | Germans Gedgauds | Jaynti Kanani, Sandeep Nailwa, Anurag Arjun, and Mihailo Bjelic |
| Native token | ETH | MATIC |
| Consensus algorithm | PoS | PoS |
| Hashing algorithm | KECCAK-256 | KECCAK-256 |
| Supports EVM | Yes | Yes |
| TPS | 4000 | 7000 |
| Block time (secs) | 13 | 2 |
| Layer | 2 | 2 |
| Supports smart contracts | Yes | Yes |
| Average transaction fee | $0.101 | $0.018 |
| Staking rewards (APR) | 0% | 4.78% |
High-level Comparisons
Is Arbitrum faster than Polygon?
No, Arbitrum only processes 4000 transactions per second. Polygon processes up to 7000.
Is Arbitrum cheaper than Polygon?
No, Arbitrum has an average transaction fee of $0.101, whereas Polygon costs $0.018.