Arbitrum vs TON
Arbitrum and TON are two popular blockchains. In this article we'll compare them across a variety of metrics. Both blockchains have their own strengths and weaknesses, and we'll explore them below.
Table of Contents
Comparing Metrics
| Arbitrum | TON | |
|---|---|---|
| Created by | Germans Gedgauds | Nikolai and Pavel Durov |
| Native token | ETH | TON |
| Consensus algorithm | PoS | PoS |
| Hashing algorithm | KECCAK-256 | KECCAK-256 |
| Supports EVM | Yes | No |
| TPS | 4000 | 1000000 |
| Block time (secs) | 13 | 5 |
| Layer | 2 | 1 |
| Supports smart contracts | Yes | Yes |
| Average transaction fee | $0.101 | $0.012375 |
| Staking rewards (APR) | 0% | 6.85% |
High-level Comparisons
Is Arbitrum faster than TON?
No, Arbitrum only processes 4000 transactions per second. TON processes up to 1000000.
Is Arbitrum cheaper than TON?
No, Arbitrum has an average transaction fee of $0.101, whereas TON costs $0.012375.