Cosmos vs Aptos
Cosmos and Aptos are two popular blockchains. In this article we'll compare them across a variety of metrics. Both blockchains have their own strengths and weaknesses, and we'll explore them below.
Table of Contents
Comparing Metrics
| Cosmos | Aptos | |
|---|---|---|
| Created by | Ethan Buchman and Jae Kwon | Avery Ching |
| Native token | ATOM | APT |
| Consensus algorithm | PoS | PoS |
| Hashing algorithm | SHA-256 | KECCAK-256 |
| Supports EVM | No | Yes |
| TPS | 10000 | 160000 |
| Block time (secs) | 1 | 4 |
| Layer | 0 | 1 |
| Supports smart contracts | Yes | Yes |
| Average transaction fee | $0.01 | $0.0000012 |
| Staking rewards (APR) | 25.4% | 7% |
High-level Comparisons
Is Cosmos faster than Aptos?
No, Cosmos only processes 10000 transactions per second. Aptos processes up to 160000.
Is Cosmos cheaper than Aptos?
No, Cosmos has an average transaction fee of $0.01, whereas Aptos costs $0.0000012.