Cosmos vs Solana
Cosmos and Solana are two popular blockchains. In this article we'll compare them across a variety of metrics. Both blockchains have their own strengths and weaknesses, and we'll explore them below.
Table of Contents
Comparing Metrics
| Cosmos | Solana | |
|---|---|---|
| Created by | Ethan Buchman and Jae Kwon | Anatoly Yakovenko |
| Native token | ATOM | SOL |
| Consensus algorithm | PoS | PoH |
| Hashing algorithm | SHA-256 | SHA-256 |
| Supports EVM | No | No |
| TPS | 10000 | 65000 |
| Block time (secs) | 1 | 0.4 |
| Layer | 0 | 1 |
| Supports smart contracts | Yes | Yes |
| Average transaction fee | $0.01 | $0.00025 |
| Staking rewards (APR) | 25.4% | 7% |
High-level Comparisons
Is Cosmos faster than Solana?
No, Cosmos only processes 10000 transactions per second. Solana processes up to 65000.
Is Cosmos cheaper than Solana?
No, Cosmos has an average transaction fee of $0.01, whereas Solana costs $0.00025.