Polkadot vs TON
Polkadot and TON are two popular blockchains. In this article we'll compare them across a variety of metrics. Both blockchains have their own strengths and weaknesses, and we'll explore them below.
Table of Contents
Comparing Metrics
| Polkadot | TON | |
|---|---|---|
| Created by | Gavin Wood, Robert Habermeier and Peter Czaban | Nikolai and Pavel Durov |
| Native token | DOT | TON |
| Consensus algorithm | PoS | PoS |
| Hashing algorithm | BLAKE2 | KECCAK-256 |
| Supports EVM | No | No |
| TPS | 1000 | 1000000 |
| Block time (secs) | 6 | 5 |
| Layer | 0 | 1 |
| Supports smart contracts | Yes | Yes |
| Average transaction fee | $0.08792 | $0.012375 |
| Staking rewards (APR) | 14.5% | 6.85% |
High-level Comparisons
Is Polkadot faster than TON?
No, Polkadot only processes 1000 transactions per second. TON processes up to 1000000.
Is Polkadot cheaper than TON?
No, Polkadot has an average transaction fee of $0.08792, whereas TON costs $0.012375.