Polygon vs Cosmos
Polygon and Cosmos are two popular blockchains. In this article we'll compare them across a variety of metrics. Both blockchains have their own strengths and weaknesses, and we'll explore them below.
Table of Contents
Comparing Metrics
| Polygon | Cosmos | |
|---|---|---|
| Created by | Jaynti Kanani, Sandeep Nailwa, Anurag Arjun, and Mihailo Bjelic | Ethan Buchman and Jae Kwon |
| Native token | MATIC | ATOM |
| Consensus algorithm | PoS | PoS |
| Hashing algorithm | KECCAK-256 | SHA-256 |
| Supports EVM | Yes | No |
| TPS | 7000 | 10000 |
| Block time (secs) | 2 | 1 |
| Layer | 2 | 0 |
| Supports smart contracts | Yes | Yes |
| Average transaction fee | $0.018 | $0.01 |
| Staking rewards (APR) | 4.78% | 25.4% |
High-level Comparisons
Is Polygon faster than Cosmos?
No, Polygon only processes 7000 transactions per second. Cosmos processes up to 10000.
Is Polygon cheaper than Cosmos?
No, Polygon has an average transaction fee of $0.018, whereas Cosmos costs $0.01.