Polygon vs TON
Polygon and TON are two popular blockchains. In this article we'll compare them across a variety of metrics. Both blockchains have their own strengths and weaknesses, and we'll explore them below.
Table of Contents
Comparing Metrics
| Polygon | TON | |
|---|---|---|
| Created by | Jaynti Kanani, Sandeep Nailwa, Anurag Arjun, and Mihailo Bjelic | Nikolai and Pavel Durov |
| Native token | MATIC | TON |
| Consensus algorithm | PoS | PoS |
| Hashing algorithm | KECCAK-256 | KECCAK-256 |
| Supports EVM | Yes | No |
| TPS | 7000 | 1000000 |
| Block time (secs) | 2 | 5 |
| Layer | 2 | 1 |
| Supports smart contracts | Yes | Yes |
| Average transaction fee | $0.018 | $0.012375 |
| Staking rewards (APR) | 4.78% | 6.85% |
High-level Comparisons
Is Polygon faster than TON?
No, Polygon only processes 7000 transactions per second. TON processes up to 1000000.
Is Polygon cheaper than TON?
No, Polygon has an average transaction fee of $0.018, whereas TON costs $0.012375.