TON vs Arbitrum
TON and Arbitrum are two popular blockchains. In this article we'll compare them across a variety of metrics. Both blockchains have their own strengths and weaknesses, and we'll explore them below.
Table of Contents
Comparing Metrics
| TON | Arbitrum | |
|---|---|---|
| Created by | Nikolai and Pavel Durov | Germans Gedgauds |
| Native token | TON | ETH |
| Consensus algorithm | PoS | PoS |
| Hashing algorithm | KECCAK-256 | KECCAK-256 |
| Supports EVM | No | Yes |
| TPS | 1000000 | 4000 |
| Block time (secs) | 5 | 13 |
| Layer | 1 | 2 |
| Supports smart contracts | Yes | Yes |
| Average transaction fee | $0.012375 | $0.101 |
| Staking rewards (APR) | 6.85% | % |
High-level Comparisons
Is TON faster than Arbitrum?
Yes, TON can process 1000000 transactions per second. Arbitrum only processes up to 4000.
Is TON cheaper than Arbitrum?
Yes, TON has an average transaction fee of $0.012375, whereas Arbitrum costs $0.101.