Arbitrum vs Avalanche
Arbitrum and Avalanche are two popular blockchains. In this article we'll compare them across a variety of metrics. Both blockchains have their own strengths and weaknesses, and we'll explore them below.
Table of Contents
Comparing Metrics
| Arbitrum | Avalanche | |
|---|---|---|
| Created by | Germans Gedgauds | Emin Gün Sirer, Kevin Sekniqi, and Ted Yin |
| Native token | ETH | AVAX |
| Consensus algorithm | PoS | PoS |
| Hashing algorithm | KECCAK-256 | KECCAK-256 |
| Supports EVM | Yes | Yes |
| TPS | 4000 | 4500 |
| Block time (secs) | 13 | 2 |
| Layer | 2 | 0 |
| Supports smart contracts | Yes | Yes |
| Average transaction fee | $0.101 | $0.12 |
| Staking rewards (APR) | 0% | 8.96% |
High-level Comparisons
Is Arbitrum faster than Avalanche?
No, Arbitrum only processes 4000 transactions per second. Avalanche processes up to 4500.
Is Arbitrum cheaper than Avalanche?
No, Arbitrum has an average transaction fee of $0.101, whereas Avalanche costs $0.12.