Avalanche vs Arbitrum
Avalanche and Arbitrum are two popular blockchains. In this article we'll compare them across a variety of metrics. Both blockchains have their own strengths and weaknesses, and we'll explore them below.
Table of Contents
Comparing Metrics
| Avalanche | Arbitrum | |
|---|---|---|
| Created by | Emin Gün Sirer, Kevin Sekniqi, and Ted Yin | Germans Gedgauds |
| Native token | AVAX | ETH |
| Consensus algorithm | PoS | PoS |
| Hashing algorithm | KECCAK-256 | KECCAK-256 |
| Supports EVM | Yes | Yes |
| TPS | 4500 | 4000 |
| Block time (secs) | 2 | 13 |
| Layer | 0 | 2 |
| Supports smart contracts | Yes | Yes |
| Average transaction fee | $0.12 | $0.101 |
| Staking rewards (APR) | 8.96% | % |
High-level Comparisons
Is Avalanche faster than Arbitrum?
Yes, Avalanche can process 4500 transactions per second. Arbitrum only processes up to 4000.
Is Avalanche cheaper than Arbitrum?
Yes, Avalanche has an average transaction fee of $0.12, whereas Arbitrum costs $0.101.