Avalanche vs Polygon
Avalanche and Polygon are two popular blockchains. In this article we'll compare them across a variety of metrics. Both blockchains have their own strengths and weaknesses, and we'll explore them below.
Table of Contents
Comparing Metrics
| Avalanche | Polygon | |
|---|---|---|
| Created by | Emin Gün Sirer, Kevin Sekniqi, and Ted Yin | Jaynti Kanani, Sandeep Nailwa, Anurag Arjun, and Mihailo Bjelic |
| Native token | AVAX | MATIC |
| Consensus algorithm | PoS | PoS |
| Hashing algorithm | KECCAK-256 | KECCAK-256 |
| Supports EVM | Yes | Yes |
| TPS | 4500 | 7000 |
| Block time (secs) | 2 | 2 |
| Layer | 0 | 2 |
| Supports smart contracts | Yes | Yes |
| Average transaction fee | $0.12 | $0.018 |
| Staking rewards (APR) | 8.96% | 4.78% |
High-level Comparisons
Is Avalanche faster than Polygon?
No, Avalanche only processes 4500 transactions per second. Polygon processes up to 7000.
Is Avalanche cheaper than Polygon?
No, Avalanche has an average transaction fee of $0.12, whereas Polygon costs $0.018.