Side-by-side reference

Avalanche vs Solana

A practical, data-led overview of how these two networks differ in architecture, throughput, and execution.

Avalanche · AVAX
Solana · SOL
Reference snapshot · July 2026

Quick comparison

Pick the metric that matters to you

Compare by

Solana lists the higher published transaction capacity.

Avalanche4,500 TPS

Solana65,000 TPSHigher reference value

This is a directional comparison of the reference data below, not investment or performance advice.

Reference table

The numbers at a glance

Values are useful for orientation; they do not measure live network performance.

Metric	Avalanche	Solana
Layer	L1	L1
Native token	AVAX	SOL
Published max TPS	4,500	65,000
Block time	2s	0.4s
Average transaction fee	$0.12	$0.00025
Consensus	Snowman PoS	PoS + PoH
Execution	EVM	Other VM
Smart contracts	Yes	Yes
Staking rewards	8.96%	7%

Architecture and execution

Avalanche is listed as a Layer 1 network and is EVM-compatible. Solana is listed as a Layer 1 network and uses a non-EVM execution environment.

Their consensus entries also differ: Avalanche lists Snowman PoS, while Solana lists PoS + PoH. That distinction describes how each network is designed; it is not a standalone quality score.

Capacity and confirmation cadence

Solana lists the higher published capacity: 65,000 TPS.

Solana lists the shorter block time: 0.4s.

Published capacity and block-time figures are useful reference points, but they are not equivalent to observed throughput, finality, or application-specific performance. Evaluate the workload, settlement requirements, and tooling before drawing a conclusion.

Costs and participation

Solana lists the lower reference fee: $0.00025.

Avalanche lists a 8.96% staking-reward rate in this reference dataset. Solana lists a 7% staking-reward rate in this reference dataset.

Fees and reward rates can change with network conditions and policy. Treat the entries here as a comparable snapshot, not as live pricing or a return forecast.

How to assess the trade-off

Start with execution compatibility: Avalanche is EVM-compatible, while Solana is not.
Then compare the reference values that matter to the application: capacity, block time, and transaction fee.
Finally, review each network’s documentation, security model, ecosystem, and current operating conditions before deploying capital or production software.

FAQ

Common questions

Which network has the higher published TPS?

Solana lists the higher published capacity: 65,000 TPS.

Which network has the lower reference fee?

Solana has the lower reference fee in this dataset.